Utilitarianism and Perfectionism: An Approach to Nozick’s Experience Machine
Abstract
Nozick’s (2017) experience machine thought experiment has been considered a critique of utilitarianism (Railton, 1984). However, it is not entirely clear the aforementioned puzzle constitutes a direct objection to utilitarianism. The present research will focus on analyzing some interpretations of the criticism of utilitarianism that is presented in said thought experiment. Firstly, the passage in question and its link with the family of utilitarian theories will be exposed. Later, it will be stated that the type of utilitarianism that Nozick attacks is preferentialism in a restrictive version. Finally, it will be asserted that the experience machine argument, although it does not qualify as a direct criticism of classical utilitarianism, places Nozick in a position close to ethical perfectionism.References
Aristóteles. (2011). Ética nicomáquea. Política. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
Bentham, J. (2000). An Introduction to the Principles of Moral and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Bradford, G. (2017). Problems for Perfectionism.Utilitas, n. 29: 344-364.
Chalmers, D. (2022). Reality +. Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. New York / Londres: W. W. Norton and Company.
Couto, A. (2014). Liberal Perfectionism. The Reasons that Goodness Gives. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter.
Darwall, S.. (2002). Welfare and Rational Care. Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.
De Lazari Radek, K. y Singer, P. (2017). Utilitarianism. A very Short Introduction. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
Feldman, F. (2004). Pleasure and the Good Life. Concerming the Nature, Varieties and Plausibility of Hedonism. New York / Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
(2011). What We Learn from the Experience Machine. R. Barder y J. Meadowcroft (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Nozick’s Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York / Oxford: Cambridge University Press: 59- 86.
Goodin, R. (2004). La utilidad y el bien. P. Singer (ed.), Compendio de ética. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Hindrinks, F. y Douven, I. (2018). Nozick’s Experience Machine: an Empirical Study. Philosophical Psychology, 31(2): 278-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1406600
Hurka, Th. (1996). Perfectionism. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mill, J. S. (2014). El utilitarismo. Un sistema de lógica (Libro VI, capítulo XII). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Mackie, J. (2000). Ética. La invención de lo bueno y lo malo. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
(1995). La naturaleza de la racionalidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
(1999). Puzzles socráticos. Madrid: Cátedra.
(2001). Invariances: The Structure of the World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
(2013). Meditaciones sobre la vida. Barcelona: Gedisa.
(2017). Anarquía, Estado y utopía. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Parfit, D. (2004). Razones y personas. Madrid: Machado Libros.
Railton, P. (1984). Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13: 134-171.
Sidgwick, H. (1962). The Methods of Ethics. New York: Macmillan an Company.
Singer, P. (1995). Ética práctica. Cambridge: University Press.
(2003). Desacralizar la vida humana. Ensayos sobre ética. Madrid: Cátedra.
(ed.) (2004). Compendio de Ética. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
(2018). Liberación animal. El clásico definitivo del movimiento animalista. Madrid: Taurus.
Sher, G. (1997). Beyond Neutrality. Perfectionism and Politics. Cambridge, New York / Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Tännsjö, T. (1998). Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Weijers, D. (2015). Nozick’s Experience Machine Is Dead, Long Live the Experience Machine! Philosophical Psychology, 27(4): 513-555. DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2012.757889.
Woodard, Ch. (2019). Taking Utilitarianism Seriously. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
